Sunday, December 27, 2009
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Sunday, December 20, 2009
BILL OF MATERIAL
DUALPULSEbom4
Please note that the following components were used for version 1 and are not necessary to install for version 2.
Q1, Q2, Q3,
D6, D7
U4
R4, R8, R9, R10, R12, R13, R27
C9
Please note that the following components were used for version 1 and are not necessary to install for version 2.
Q1, Q2, Q3,
D6, D7
U4
R4, R8, R9, R10, R12, R13, R27
C9
Saturday, December 19, 2009
Finished Dual Pulse Welder
The oscilloscope photo above shows a 12.6 Volt, 5Ms and 15.1Ms weld. Both pulses and the charge times is measured between the two purple lines and is 189Ms which is more than 5 welds per second at this setting.
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Photo's
Left to right : Pulse1, Pulse2 and Voltage adjustment
This took me way longer than expected and I was hoping to have it done by the end of this weekend. The aluminum brackets that the pcb's are on took me most of Saturday to make. I broke two brackets before getting it right and then had a hard time mounting the pcb without making a short. I finally cut all my hard work off and put a piece of wood between the the two cut offs. Bending, drilling and fitting the copper bars took up all of today.I did however test the dual pulse before tackling this job and I am very pleased with the results. It works better than expected and you can use any one of the two pulses by turning anyone off or use both. At this moment you get two bleeps when you use the dual pulse and one bleep when you use one pulse, it is very fast though and sounds more like a long and a short bleep. It's things like this that needs a little attention.
I will try and have it finished by next weekend and hopefully get it on youtube.
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Just a quick update
I'm done writing the code for the dual pulse and ran it on a simulator but haven't tested it on the welder yet. I took my old welder apart and are in a process of building the new design into that box. I had to cut the Mosfet board and the heat sinks smaller to fit and will post the pictures when I'm done. I was looking into using Joules and Watt Second and not time to control the welder and I will definitely use that to control this welder with a version 3 chip after this one.
What is the difference? Joule and Watt Second will look at the resistance and adjust the time automatically to make better controlled welds and preventing burning holes when the pressure on the electrodes are not same. It will also give you the exact energy release when you are welding different resistances.
What is the difference? Joule and Watt Second will look at the resistance and adjust the time automatically to make better controlled welds and preventing burning holes when the pressure on the electrodes are not same. It will also give you the exact energy release when you are welding different resistances.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
ALMOST DONE
Well, I'm busy with the dual pulse code for the processor and also a couple of bugs that is p***ing me off :)) I guess everyone is asking "why so many Mosfets?". Many Mosfets in parallel lowers the resistance that lowers the heat and increase the amps. The difference between six of these Mosfets and eighteen is a couple of hundred amps more and a welder that is not going to overheat and burn out. You can also see that I get excellent controlled welds at much lower energy rates than commercial welders out there. I'm also turning this Mosfets on and off at precise calculated speeds according to the data sheets to prevent them from going up in smoke.
I'm in the process of ordering more boards and will hopefully be done with the programming by the time they come in to make it available to you guys.
Thursday, November 26, 2009
CHARGING SPEED
The voltage on the left is the actual capacitor voltage and the voltage on the right is the set point. This was just a test with a 19Ohm resistor connected to the discharge terminal causing the discharge to be very slow when the set point is lowered. This will be much faster with a resistor bank with a lower resistance.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
PCB TEST
I've spent this weekend putting the new PCB together( I actually had it built before Friday) and it was very easy to build. You will need magnifying glasses, a good light and a hot air soldering iron for the surface mount components. The rest of the components are soldered at the bottom side and the solder gets pulled into the holes so no soldering is necessary at the top. There are two problems however, I screwed up on the solder mask on the Mosfets and you have to scratch the mask off around the solder points to get a bigger solder area and Diode 10 needs to be turned around.
The charging speed is so fast with a 12 Amp supply that when the capacitor reached it's set point and the mosfet kicks in when the voltage drops 0.1V that it actually overshoots the set point by 0.4V before turning the Mosfet off. I've been writing some really complicated code to try and fix this issue.
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
THE PCB'S ARRIVED
Well, the PCB's finally came in. I have a very expensive camera and as you can see I'm not very good with taking photo's. This board is very solid and absolutely of high quality. I don't know why, but my camera makes the middle of the board look like its bent and some of the silver on the board look like it's black.
I will build this board this weekend and post more photos.
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Thursday, November 12, 2009
CAPACITOR DISCHARGING EXPLAINED
I was browsing the internet and found many sites where the guys think that they will get the same or better welders by making the voltage higher and the capacitance lower. Yes, it will be cheaper and easier to increase the voltage to get more Joules or Watt-second (1/2x capacitance x voltage x voltage) BUT here is the catch: The capacitance of your cap and the resistance that you weld, determine the length of your weld and not the WATT-SECOND. In other words if you have a 1 farad cap, charged to 35Volt (612Ws) then it will completely discharge in 15ms if you weld metal with a resistance of 0.003Ohm (0.005 nickel).
If you increase the voltage to 50V then you will have 1250Ws and your capacitor will still discharge in 15ms at the same resistance.
With a bigger capacitor, lets say 3farad at 20Volt (600Ws), will discharge over a 45ms period.
You can already see what is happening here: A higher voltage will give you more current discharged into your work piece in a shorter time. It will produce more heat, is very hard to control and will make welding thinner metals very difficult, meaning that 0.1ms can give you a nice weld and 0.2 might burn a hole in your work piece.
With a lower voltage and bigger capacitance your weld will be more spread out and will have less current than above but it will give you a much better controlled weld and fuse your metals better and stronger together.
The higher Ws makes a big difference but the capacitance should also be bigger to give longer and better controlled welds.The Volts and Capacitance needs to be balanced to make a good welder.
For battery packs, I will suggest the higher capacitance and that is what I'm building here.
ANY VOLTAGE, 60V AND OVER, AC OR DC CAN KILL YOU! VOLTAGES BETWEEN 50 AND 60V MIGHT GIVE YOU A TICKLE BUT IT WON'T HURT YOU. THIS WELDERS WITH VOLTAGES OF 20V IS TOTALLY SAFE AND YOU CAN HOLD THE PROBES IN YOUR HAND WHILE 10000AMP IS FLOWING THROUGH IT WITHOUT FEELING A THING.
If you increase the voltage to 50V then you will have 1250Ws and your capacitor will still discharge in 15ms at the same resistance.
With a bigger capacitor, lets say 3farad at 20Volt (600Ws), will discharge over a 45ms period.
You can already see what is happening here: A higher voltage will give you more current discharged into your work piece in a shorter time. It will produce more heat, is very hard to control and will make welding thinner metals very difficult, meaning that 0.1ms can give you a nice weld and 0.2 might burn a hole in your work piece.
With a lower voltage and bigger capacitance your weld will be more spread out and will have less current than above but it will give you a much better controlled weld and fuse your metals better and stronger together.
The higher Ws makes a big difference but the capacitance should also be bigger to give longer and better controlled welds.The Volts and Capacitance needs to be balanced to make a good welder.
For battery packs, I will suggest the higher capacitance and that is what I'm building here.
ANY VOLTAGE, 60V AND OVER, AC OR DC CAN KILL YOU! VOLTAGES BETWEEN 50 AND 60V MIGHT GIVE YOU A TICKLE BUT IT WON'T HURT YOU. THIS WELDERS WITH VOLTAGES OF 20V IS TOTALLY SAFE AND YOU CAN HOLD THE PROBES IN YOUR HAND WHILE 10000AMP IS FLOWING THROUGH IT WITHOUT FEELING A THING.
Friday, November 6, 2009
NOVEMBER 6Th
I finally have 3 boards on order. I ordered only 3 because of the overall high price (tooling amount) and will test them first before ordering more at a cheaper price and also to see how many of you guys will be interested.
I am waiting for parts to build I guess the part of this project that everyone is waiting for. I am trying to make this welder as cheap as possible and this weekend my calculator kept on spitting out data that I didn’t like. I have a circuit that turns my SCR’s off but to build it to work with all big SCR’s out there will be more difficult and expensive than just using Mosfets for the actual weld. I never wanted to use Mosfets but looking at the numbers made me change my mind.
Big SCR’s have an ON resistance of about 1.5mOhm (It differs). If we do a quick calculation you will see that if we make the resistance of the metal that we weld 0(dead short because we are trying to figure out the max current to protect our components) then we only need the Capacitor's ESR and the SCR’s ON resistance to work out the actual max current at the moment the switch is closed (we are not going to use the wire and weld probe resistance because they are variables)
Let’s say our Cap have an ESR of 1.6mOhm. If we use the above SCR and charge our cap to 20V (max) then 1.6 + 1.5 = 0.0031Ohm. I = V/R 20/0.0031 = 6452Amps.
The Mosfets in parallel that I’m going to use will have a much lower ON resistance of 0.0002Ohm which will give us about 11111Amps for a split second(much higher than the SCR). The current will be less if we add the wire and probe resistances and also the metal that we are going to weld. The number of Mosfets in parallel will also give us a much bigger surface area to work with.
I should receive the PCB’s by the 17Th. I am busy designing this new Mosfet circuit and will post pictures and more informationTomorrow when I'm done.
I am waiting for parts to build I guess the part of this project that everyone is waiting for. I am trying to make this welder as cheap as possible and this weekend my calculator kept on spitting out data that I didn’t like. I have a circuit that turns my SCR’s off but to build it to work with all big SCR’s out there will be more difficult and expensive than just using Mosfets for the actual weld. I never wanted to use Mosfets but looking at the numbers made me change my mind.
Big SCR’s have an ON resistance of about 1.5mOhm (It differs). If we do a quick calculation you will see that if we make the resistance of the metal that we weld 0(dead short because we are trying to figure out the max current to protect our components) then we only need the Capacitor's ESR and the SCR’s ON resistance to work out the actual max current at the moment the switch is closed (we are not going to use the wire and weld probe resistance because they are variables)
Let’s say our Cap have an ESR of 1.6mOhm. If we use the above SCR and charge our cap to 20V (max) then 1.6 + 1.5 = 0.0031Ohm. I = V/R 20/0.0031 = 6452Amps.
The Mosfets in parallel that I’m going to use will have a much lower ON resistance of 0.0002Ohm which will give us about 11111Amps for a split second(much higher than the SCR). The current will be less if we add the wire and probe resistances and also the metal that we are going to weld. The number of Mosfets in parallel will also give us a much bigger surface area to work with.
I should receive the PCB’s by the 17Th. I am busy designing this new Mosfet circuit and will post pictures and more information
Sunday, October 25, 2009
UPDATE OCTOBER 25th 2009
I have added the over voltage protection circuit and updated the Schematic and 3D board below. I ran the Capacitor charging circuit through some heavy testing and it performed better and faster than all calculations. I designed this PCB in such a way that I can easily add a new feature or change an existing one by just changing the programming on the microprocessor. I have some more tests to do and painstakingly go through every component and hole sizes to make sure everything is perfect before ordering some professionally made boards.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
I've spent a week reading through data sheets trying to find a suitable mosfet driver for this welder. The LTC driver that I selected is kind of an overkill but it works very good. I also changed the code to the Micro in such a way that when the capacitor is completely discharged or at a low voltage it will limit the current to protect the Mosfet and the transformer. I am busy designing an over voltage protection that will turn the mosfet off if the voltage goes over 20V and also a separate over voltage protection for the capacitor if the mosfet fails. The charging speed is fast enough for a dual pulse so I'm kind of throwing the contactor idea away at this moment(still have all the files) and working on making this a solid state welder that will be much cheaper than the $5000 price tag. Hang in there and don't build it yet until I give the go ahead.
Friday, September 25, 2009
If you put, lets say 16V on a capacitor that needs to be charged then it would start to charge very fast and then slow down the closer it gets to 16V (look at a capacitors charging curve).The last 2 to 3 volts can take 75% longer than the first 13 to 14 volts. To overcome this slow down effect we need a more constant current and it's done by increasing the voltage to +- 36VDC (rectified 24VAC). This DC voltage is used to charge the cap and the processor turns the charging mosfet off within 4uS when it reached it's set point (max 20V).
If the set point is lower than the capacitor volts, the processor will turns a mosfet on that connects a resistor bank to discharge the capacitor. EASY HUH?
The photos shows the LCD display with a 1 Farad Pro Ice capacitor that has been charged to 19.1VDC with a switching (processor controlled) rectified 24VAC.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Friday, September 11, 2009
TAB WELDER 3D UPDATED 10/25/2009
I made many changes to make this board easier to build. I moved some of the components around to make more space for the heat sinks and I replaced some of the very small surface mount components with bigger ones. I also made some of the circuits wider because they were really very fine and hard to solder without burning them off.
Saturday, September 5, 2009
Tabwelder PCB
I used the hacked Laminator below and the Toner transfer method to make this double sided beauty. CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO SEE A FULL SIZE PHOTO. TO ZOOM IN AND OUT CLICK ON THE IMAGE, HOLD YOUR CTRL KEY AND ROLL YOUR MOUSE WHEEL. IN CASE YOU DIDN'T KNOW THIS, YOU CAN ZOOM IN AND OUT ON WEB PAGES AND DOCUMENTS ON YOUR COMPUTER BY USING THIS TECHNIQUE.
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
18V Dewalt Battery pack
Battery packs are very expensive. With this Capacitor discharge welder you can build your own battery packs cheap. This is the only welder that has Pulse width control on the internet.
I'm busy with step by step instruction and a schematic to build this welder. I'm done with the control schematic and will post it soon. The above photo's are a rebuild DeWalt 18v battery pack that cost me about $20....a new pack would have cost me $94 + tax.
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
PCB LAMINATOR HACK
This is a very small PCB that I made with the hacked Laminator (just testing and not putting much effort in to make it look good) and the tracks are very small (11 mil or 0.3mm). There is one place where the tracks are touching but by looking at my PCB program the track clearance was set for 2mil and that is way too small.
PCB's up to 1.6mm will go through. Go here to see how to make crisp good looking PCB's with the toner transfer method using this laminator.
Unfortunately I could only find one component at Digikey and one at Mouser but you might have more luck finding both at one place on the web. The thermal fuse was $0.99 and the Thermostat $4.50. The thermal fuse is there for a final protection before the unit catches fire. You can just take the fuse out and connect (jump) the two wires but like PodeCoet said "don't forget to send me photos when it catches fire"
I've been making PCB's for years and I had different ways of making them, including using a router, like my video below. My router's PCB's came out really good but it took hours of setting the machine up and then watched it in slow motion cut the tracks. The circuits is actually called isolated circuits and it makes it very difficult to solder small surface mount parts. One little drop of solder falling between the isolated track underneath a component and it takes hours of finding it. I was looking around on the internet and found an interesting web site that uses the Toner Transfer Method and a hacked Laminator to make really good looking boards. You can find PodeCoet's hacked Laminator here. He was using an Australian laminator and added a resistor in series with an electronic temperature control to make the laminator warmer. I looked around and found a GBC Personel laminator at Digikey for $69 + tax and shipping(not converted). Way too expensive for me! I found the same one on E-bay for $24, no tax and free shipping and converted it to a warmer 338F temperature for a couple of bucks more. Look at the photos above how to hack a US laminator and PodeCoet's site for more information. CLICK ON THE IMAGES TO SEE A FULL SIZE PHOTO
PCB's up to 1.6mm will go through. Go here to see how to make crisp good looking PCB's with the toner transfer method using this laminator.
Unfortunately I could only find one component at Digikey and one at Mouser but you might have more luck finding both at one place on the web. The thermal fuse was $0.99 and the Thermostat $4.50. The thermal fuse is there for a final protection before the unit catches fire. You can just take the fuse out and connect (jump) the two wires but like PodeCoet said "don't forget to send me photos when it catches fire"
I've been making PCB's for years and I had different ways of making them, including using a router, like my video below. My router's PCB's came out really good but it took hours of setting the machine up and then watched it in slow motion cut the tracks. The circuits is actually called isolated circuits and it makes it very difficult to solder small surface mount parts. One little drop of solder falling between the isolated track underneath a component and it takes hours of finding it. I was looking around on the internet and found an interesting web site that uses the Toner Transfer Method and a hacked Laminator to make really good looking boards. You can find PodeCoet's hacked Laminator here. He was using an Australian laminator and added a resistor in series with an electronic temperature control to make the laminator warmer. I looked around and found a GBC Personel laminator at Digikey for $69 + tax and shipping(not converted). Way too expensive for me! I found the same one on E-bay for $24, no tax and free shipping and converted it to a warmer 338F temperature for a couple of bucks more. Look at the photos above how to hack a US laminator and PodeCoet's site for more information. CLICK ON THE IMAGES TO SEE A FULL SIZE PHOTO
Saturday, August 1, 2009
Saturday, June 27, 2009
Saturday, June 13, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)